XML vs XHTML — Key Differences
XML and XHTML as markup languages — the limitations of classic HTML, and how each spec addresses them differently.
Restored from a 2020-09 archive.
What are XML and XHTML, and how do they differ?
Both are markup languages that define web document formats. XML is a general-purpose markup language recommended by W3C for building special-purpose markup languages. XHTML combines that XML foundation with the existing features of HTML.
Traits of Classic HTML
- HTML user agents are very forgiving about errors
- Invalid tag usage, unclosed tags, or broken nesting are either ignored or quietly accepted by browsers
- Focused on how tags look rather than the meaning of the data
- Weak at structuring information, expressing relations, or validating content
HTML was originally an application of SGML. Because SGML is quite complex, most browsers didn't fully follow it — real-world HTML is a customized markup language influenced by SGML. This made HTML user-friendly but weak in extensibility and flexibility.
XML
- Created to address the limitations of HTML
- Born from the desire to go beyond the fixed HTML vocabulary
- A meta-markup language like SGML, but simplified so parsers are easier to build
- The "X" stands for extensible — you can define custom tags rather than using a fixed set
- Focuses on data transport and representation rather than visual document structure
- Content and presentation are fully separated — data structure and content are described in XML, and stylesheets drive presentation
XHTML
- A combination of HTML's familiarity with XML's rigor
- More structured syntax, stricter rules
- Improved search capability and more complex data processing
- Strict parsing means a malformed document can break completely
- When served as
application/xhtml+xmlortext/xml, parsed as XHTML. In IE, the type wasn't recognized and triggered download prompts, so serving IE withtext/htmlwas a common fallback
Guestbook
Leave a short note about this post
Loading...